Should the Leader Advocate for Change?
Whether clergy leaders should openly advocate for specific changes or maintain facilitative neutrality. The risks and benefits of leader-driven change initiatives.
Church and synagogue consulting in the Alban Institute tradition
Whether clergy leaders should openly advocate for specific changes or maintain facilitative neutrality. The risks and benefits of leader-driven change initiatives.
What boards should focus on during periods of rapid, unpredictable change: keeping eyes on mission and long-term direction while delegating day-to-day management.
Identifying a short list of true priorities rather than trying to do everything. How congregations can resist strategic sprawl and commit to what matters most.
How governance structures determine which leaders have the authority to commit the congregation’s resources, time, and reputation on behalf of the whole.
How congregations can manage the constant stream of new ideas from enthusiastic members without dismissing them or being distracted from strategic priorities.
How leaders and board members can respond constructively when a congregational decision does not go their way. Modeling graceful acceptance of democratic process.
How to build organizational confidence and capability by successfully completing big projects. How to pick the right project, lead it well, and use success to build momentum.
How to develop lasting governance policies rather than endless ad hoc decisions. Boards must delegate clear policy-making authority to staff while setting appropriate limits.
Smaller congregations actually need good governance more, not less. How boards of smaller congregations can delegate authority effectively even with limited staff.
When congregations should decline donated gifts — money, property, or services — that come with strings attached or do not serve the mission.